Why Your Emails Should Be Designed For Mobile [Infographic]

email_responsive_design.png

Did you know that 75% of the companies do not optimize email for mobiles yet? With 43% of the people now reading and responding emails through mobiles — a figure that is expected to hit 50% in 2013 — coupled with the fact 97% of the people view emails once, it becomes clear marketers should design emails to render properly on mobile devices.

Check out this infographic that’s packed with charts and graphs that share how mobile is permeating the email experience.

responsive-email-design-mobile-templates.gif

via Adrants http://www.adrants.com/2013/05/why-your-emails-should-be-designed-for.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+adrants+%28Adrants%29

Ever see a new design and immediately have a dubstep beat drop in your head? Probably not, but it happened to me today. So inspired.

Old-Spice-introduces-newest-spokesman-Mr-Wolfdog

Banner ads are dead. Long live banner ads.

Some troubling numbers coming out of the US in terms of banner ads and engagement. As much as we can say that online is the new frontier, that is no longer the case. I can think of 5.3 Trillion reasons why online is now traditional advertising. I can’t think of another medium that might serve 5.3 Trillion of something, making online the most cluttered medium I know of. (that’s a scientific fact). The full list is below:

  1. Over 5.3 trillion display ads were served to U.S. users last year. (ComScore)
  2. That’s 1 trillion more than 2009. (ComScore)
  3. The typical Internet user is served 1,707 banner ads per month. (Comscore)
  4. Click-through rates are .1 percent. (DoubleClick)
  5.  The 468 x 60 banner has a .04 percent click rate. (DoubleClick)
  6. An estimated 31 percent of ad impressions can’t be viewed by users. (Comscore)
  7. The display advertising Lumascape has 318 logos. (Luma Partners)
  8. 8 percent of Internet users account for 85 percent of clicks. (ComScore)
  9. Up to 50 percent of clicks on mobile banner ads are accidental. (GoldSpot Media)
  10. Mobile CPMs are 75 cents. (Kleiner Perkins)
  11. You’re more likely to survive a plane crash than click a banner ad. (Solve Media)
  12. 15 percent of people trust banner ads completely or somewhat, compared to 29 percent for TV ads. (eMarketer)
  13. 34 percent don’t trust banner ads at all or much, compared to 26 percent for magazine ads. (eMarketer)
  14. 25-34-year olds see 2,094 banner ads per month. (ComScore)
  15. 445 different advertisers delivered more than a billion banner ads in 2012. (ComScore)

Source: Digiday, Randy Cronin

Left-Right-Brain-Illustrations-1

Passion, Proactivity & Competence

I’d like to make an amendment to an earlier post I wrote about the Arc Concept.

There are only 3 things I expect from others as much as myself:

Passion. This can mean many things to many people. Passion for your craft. Putting the agency first and believing in its mission and the people within it. The fire in your gut that forces you to aim higher and higher and the will to see it through. If you lack passion, get out of my way.

Proactivity. If you (day) dream about your work and actively work ahead even when you don’t have to, you are my kind of proactive. To use a rugby analogy, proactivity is driven from the front line. Cleats in the mud. Shoulder against the grind stone. Pushing. Straining. Willing the enemy to give up. If you lack proactivity, get behind me and try to keep up.

Competence. Knowing your business, and your client’s business, cold. Being able to talk about pixels and mobile strategy as easily as paper weight and duplexing. Being attentive to detail. Having a skillset that’s invaluable. Being the rock that binds the team together on stormy seas. If you aren’t competent, you can apply for our job with our competition.

Hire slow, fire fast. It’s a life and death world out there.

The next 10 years in digital

I’ve been addicted to thefwa and awwwards over the past week. Like thinking about the inspiration they provide in my sleep addicted. When I get like that, I know that I’m either A) on to something or B) need to write about it to get it out of my head. In this case, I think it’s a bit of both…

Over the past two year at RED, we’ve been working day and night to catch up to what we perceive to be the global standard of digital experiences. To me, this means that when we’re working with a client we develop their website, campaign microsite or mobile app to do 3 things really well: 1. Leverage the medium to bring their brand to life. 2. Work beautifully regardless of the device. 3. Have an X factor that makes the experience really special. And not surprising, there are only a handful of firms around the world that are doing this well. Like these guys. Or these guys. Or these guys.

And up until last week, I thought we were really close to breaking through. We’ve been on a roll lately with responsive WordPress-driven websites and some new design talent that has been developing some jaw droppingly beautiful work.

CCEMC.ca - Projects Page

And then two things happened…

First. One of our developers, Marcel, starts to talk one day during a briefing about a framework he wants to use for an upcoming project for a client called Django. It would allow us to not only provide our client with a CMS driven site that is easy for them to update and manage, but also allow us to build a site that functions much like an iPhone app – it wouldn’t require a refresh every time a link is clicked, it would just react and deliver the next set of data seamlessly.

Second. Literally the same day, I stumble across this… (edited for length, original here)

FWA’s Rob Ford: Looking 10 years in to the future, how far can websites go?

Fi Founder David Martin: What did I say 10 years ago to this question? Today I say that in 10 years, “websites” will be the WAP of today. Design will be centered on a “low level of effort” to engage with utility and consume or share content. That means the least amount of physical and mental effort to send an email or read the news… We will not be using “websites.” The more devices that come in play, (mobile, smart TV’s, Google Glass) the more a ubiquitous user experience is required with not one device dominating as the desktop or website that have done so for the past 10 years.

All of a sudden, something clicked in my head. It appears that we’ve been chasing the wrong rabbit – or at least, not the rabbit the firms we admire have been after. Not only are they thinking about how each device will impact the experience they are trying to create, but they are also thinking about how they can bring more of that ‘app’ thinking back into the web. It’s more than responsive design and it’s more than WordPress. It’s about making the entire mobile experience seamless from the phone/tablet through to the browser and back again.

Up until last week, I was hopeful for a project that would allow me to create something inline with this example from Range Rover or this one from D’Angelico Guitars. But the web is already transitioning away from showy HTML5 experiences that, while a design and technical achievement in their own right, do nothing for the end user other than provide them with a little visual design porn for a few minutes.

We’re working on a little something for a client that will bring us closer to ‘web app nirvana’ than anything we’ve ever done. And you can bet we’ll be submitting it to FWA and Awwwards to pay it forward for those on the same journey as I am.